Fix confused and buggy bridge splashing code
A bridge (span or tower) must be splashed when it gets damaged below SCT_MINEFF. Likewise when its last supporting sector (bridge head or tower) gets damaged below SCT_MINEFF, unless EASY_BRIDGES is enabled. We need to check this whenever a bridge head, span or tower gets damaged. This is done in three places, and all of them screw up: * checksect() ignores damage to bridge heads. It also leaves writing back the sector it checks to the caller, which never happens when it's called from sct_postread(). Note that checksect() drowns all planes on bridges it splashes. Functions that need to exempt flying planes from such a fate have to splash bridges themselves. * sect_damage() ignores damage to bridge towers, and damage to bridge spans unless EASY_BRIDGES is enabled. It then runs checksect(), which compensates for these omissions, but happily drowns the planes sect_damage() attempts to protect. * eff_bomb() ignores damage to bridge heads. Collateral damage makes sect_damage() run, which compensates for the omission. This causes the following bugs: * Efficiency damage going through sect_damage() can drown planes it shouldn't. This affects pinpoint bombing when collateral damage splashes a bridge, and strategic bombing. The drowned planes then crash and burn when they attempt to land at their (just splashed) base. * Efficiency damage to bridge heads not going through sect_damage() fails to collapse unsupported bridges. This affects pin-bombing efficiency without collateral damage, and ground combat. Also deity commands edit, setsector and add, but that could be regarded as a feature. * If the sector file somehow ends up with an inefficient bridge span, it collapses on every read again and again, until it collapses on a write. Related problems exist with other actions of checksect(), and they're not addressed here. * If the sector file somehow ends up with adjacent inefficient bridge towers, checksect() on any of them recurses infinitely: - checksect() inefficient tower T1 - knockdown() T1, but don't write that back to the sector file - bridgefall() T1; this reads all adjacent sectors, including inefficient towert T2 - checksect() T2 - knockdown() T2, but don't write that back to the sector file - bridgefall() T1; this reads adjacent sectors including T1 - checksect() T1 ... This commit creates a new function bridge_damaged() to splash any bridges that became inefficient or unsupported after damage to a sector. To avoid the inifinite recursion, we call it in sct_prewrite() instead of checksect(). No uses knockdown() outside bridgefall.c remain, so give it internal linkage.
This commit is contained in:
parent
13cca55a9d
commit
40eb78eb74
5 changed files with 30 additions and 25 deletions
|
@ -369,14 +369,7 @@ eff_bomb(struct emp_qelem *list, struct sctstr *target)
|
|||
"%s bombing raid did %d%% damage in %s\n",
|
||||
cname(player->cnum), oldeff - target->sct_effic,
|
||||
xyas(target->sct_x, target->sct_y, target->sct_own));
|
||||
if (target->sct_effic < SCT_MINEFF) {
|
||||
if (target->sct_type == SCT_BSPAN)
|
||||
knockdown(target, list);
|
||||
else if (target->sct_type == SCT_BTOWER) {
|
||||
knockdown(target, list);
|
||||
bridgefall(target, list);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
bridge_damaged(target, list);
|
||||
putsect(§);
|
||||
collateral_damage(target->sct_x, target->sct_y, dam, list);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue