navigate march: Say "to sweep mines" instead of "to minesweep"
The choice of "to minesweep" in "`d' to drop mines, and `m' to minesweep" is obviously intentional. But saying it in standard English instead is at least as clear, so do that. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c5a2d136ec
commit
90f5822a85
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ unit_move(struct emp_qelem *list)
|
|||
type == EF_SHIP ? "flagship" : "leader");
|
||||
pr("`r' to radar, %s`l' to look, `M' to map, `B' to bmap,\n",
|
||||
type == EF_SHIP ? "`s' to sonar, " : "");
|
||||
pr("`d' to drop mines, and `m' to minesweep\n");
|
||||
pr("`d' to drop mines, and `m' to sweep mines\n");
|
||||
cp = "";
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
|
|||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 b n
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 `h' to stop, `v' to view, `i' to list ships, `f' to change flagship,
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 `r' to radar, `s' to sonar, `l' to look, `M' to map, `B' to bmap,
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 `d' to drop mines, and `m' to minesweep
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 `d' to drop mines, and `m' to sweep mines
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 . =
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 h h h
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 c c
|
||||
|
@ -776,7 +776,7 @@
|
|||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 b n
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 `h' to stop, `v' to view, `i' to list units, `f' to change leader,
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 `r' to radar, `l' to look, `M' to map, `B' to bmap,
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 `d' to drop mines, and `m' to minesweep
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 `d' to drop mines, and `m' to sweep mines
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 . =
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 h h h
|
||||
Play#1 output Play#1 1 c c
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue