Don't revert sectors without military to old owner
Change checksect() not to abandon occupied sectors to the old owner when there is no military and no land units. This effectively restores pre-Chainsaw 3 behavior. Matching change to would_abandon(). Rationale. Traditional ways to change sector owner: (1) Attack, assault, paradrop can transfer a sector to the attacker, in take_def(). (2) Guerrilla warfare at the update can transfer a sector to the old owner, in guerilla(). This happens when che kill all military and the sector is sufficiently disloyal to the owner. (3) Whenever all civilians, military and land units are removed from a sector, no matter how, it silently reverts to the deity, in checksect(). Chainsaw 3 added: (4) Whenever all military and land units are removed from an occupied sector, no matter how, it silently reverts to the old owner, in checksect(). This addition isn't seamless. Funnies include: * When che kill all military and land units, but the sector is loyal, (3) doesn't transfer to the old owner. But since there's no military and land units left, (4) transfers it anyway, only without telling the lucky old owner. The latter transfer is buggy: checksect() runs only on ef_read() and ef_write(), not the update (bug#1010856), so the silent transfer is delayed until the next ef_write(). But code using ef_read() sees it right away. For instance, the path finder, which doesn't use ef_read(), can route a path through a sector lost that way. The actual move, which does use ef_read(), then chokes on that path. * When you attack a sector, and get defeated with the help of reacting land units, but succeed in killing the *local* defenders, (4) makes the sector silently revert to the old owner. Which might be somebody who wasn't involved in the fight, and gets no notification whatsoever of his windfall. * You can abandon a sector to the old-owner by removing all military and land units from it, in a myriad of ways. Some ways ask you for confirmation (move, march, load), many don't (navigate, plane construction, delivery; arguably bugs), and others simply don't let you (paradrop, fly, distribution). This problem also exists for abandoning to deity, i.e. through (3) instead of (4). Some ways to move out civilians don't let you do that (distribute), but most do. However, accidentally abandoning an empty sector to deity is less serious than a populated one to another player. In my opinion, (4) doesn't add much to the game, and fixing the funnies isn't worth the effort.
This commit is contained in:
parent
950ec3e60e
commit
f84d25378b
2 changed files with 16 additions and 27 deletions
|
@ -367,22 +367,19 @@ want_to_abandon(struct sctstr *sp, i_type vtype, int amnt, struct lndstr *lp)
|
|||
int
|
||||
would_abandon(struct sctstr *sp, i_type vtype, int amnt, struct lndstr *lp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int mil, loyalcivs;
|
||||
int mil, civs;
|
||||
|
||||
if (vtype != I_CIVIL && vtype != I_MILIT)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mil = sp->sct_item[I_MILIT];
|
||||
loyalcivs = sp->sct_item[I_CIVIL];
|
||||
civs = sp->sct_item[I_CIVIL];
|
||||
|
||||
if (vtype == I_MILIT)
|
||||
mil -= amnt;
|
||||
if (vtype == I_CIVIL)
|
||||
loyalcivs -= amnt;
|
||||
if (sp->sct_own != sp->sct_oldown)
|
||||
loyalcivs = 0;
|
||||
civs -= amnt;
|
||||
|
||||
return sp->sct_own != 0
|
||||
&& loyalcivs <= 0 && mil <= 0
|
||||
return sp->sct_own != 0 && civs <= 0 && mil <= 0
|
||||
&& !has_units(sp->sct_x, sp->sct_y, sp->sct_own, lp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ item_prewrite(short *item)
|
|||
static int
|
||||
checksect(struct sctstr *sp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int mil, civs, loyalcivs;
|
||||
int mil, civs;
|
||||
natid own;
|
||||
|
||||
item_prewrite(sp->sct_item);
|
||||
|
@ -97,30 +97,22 @@ checksect(struct sctstr *sp)
|
|||
|
||||
mil = sp->sct_item[I_MILIT];
|
||||
civs = sp->sct_item[I_CIVIL];
|
||||
if (sp->sct_own == sp->sct_oldown)
|
||||
loyalcivs = civs;
|
||||
else
|
||||
loyalcivs = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (sp->sct_own != 0 && !civs) {
|
||||
sp->sct_work = 100;
|
||||
sp->sct_oldown = sp->sct_own;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* If they have a military unit there, they still own it */
|
||||
if (sp->sct_own && !loyalcivs && !(sp->sct_flags & MOVE_IN_PROGRESS)) {
|
||||
if (!mil && !has_units(sp->sct_x, sp->sct_y, sp->sct_own, 0)) {
|
||||
/* more cruft! */
|
||||
own = sp->sct_own;
|
||||
if (sp->sct_oldown == sp->sct_own) {
|
||||
makelost(EF_SECTOR, sp->sct_own, 0, sp->sct_x, sp->sct_y);
|
||||
sp->sct_own = 0;
|
||||
sp->sct_oldown = 0;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
takeover(sp, sp->sct_oldown);
|
||||
sp->sct_mobil = 0;
|
||||
if (sp->sct_type == SCT_CAPIT || sp->sct_type == SCT_MOUNT)
|
||||
caploss(sp, own, "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (sp->sct_own && !civs && !mil
|
||||
&& !has_units(sp->sct_x, sp->sct_y, sp->sct_own, NULL)
|
||||
&& !(sp->sct_flags & MOVE_IN_PROGRESS)) {
|
||||
/* more cruft! */
|
||||
own = sp->sct_own;
|
||||
makelost(EF_SECTOR, sp->sct_own, 0, sp->sct_x, sp->sct_y);
|
||||
sp->sct_own = 0;
|
||||
sp->sct_mobil = 0;
|
||||
if (sp->sct_type == SCT_CAPIT || sp->sct_type == SCT_MOUNT)
|
||||
caploss(sp, own, "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue