Command functions are traditionally named like the command shortened
to four characters. When this name collides with a keyword or library
function, we abbreviate more: brea(), rea(). A few are unabbreviated,
e.g. execute(). A few have different names, e.g. explain(), not
list().
Commit 23726b379 (v4.3.0) suppressed a GCC warning about carg()
colliding with its built-in function.
Ron Koenderink reported Microsoft Visual Studio 2019 fails to link:
"_carg already defined in ucrtd.lib(ucrtbased.dll)".
Time to clean this up: rename the functions to c_FOO(), where FOO is
the unabbreviated name of the command.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
When option TECH_POP is enabled, the cost of tech increases when
civilian population exceeds 50000. Only civilians in old-owned
sectors count. This differs from education and happiness, where
civilians loaded on ships and land units count, too.
The update counts population for TECH_POP with count_pop(). This is
an extra pass over all sectors.
produce also uses count_pop(), once per tech center examined.
Wasteful.
budget avoids count_pop(): it uses tax()'s civilian count. More
efficient, but the difference to the update is ugly.
Change TECH_POP to use the same civilian count as education and
happiness, i.e. count civilians on ships and land units, too.
This count is available in nat_budget[] in time for produce(): it's
computed by tax() and by ship and land unit maintenance. So use it
there. This takes care of the update and budget. produce doesn't run
enough update code to do the same. Keep calling count_pop() there.
Update it to match the update, and give it internal linkage.
Duplicating update's workings there is ugly, so mark it FIXME.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
prod() duplicates the update's sector production code, except it
computes both output with present materials ("make" output) and output
not limited by lack of materials or production backlog ("max" output).
It also rounds materials consumed up instead of randomly.
Factor prod_output() out of produce() for reuse by prod(). prod()
runs it twice: once for "make" output and once for "max" output.
Test output changes are due to random rounding.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Sector production computes a number of intermediate values, and rounds
many of them. We've tinkered with the rounding a few times. It
currently works as follows.
There are two production efficiencies, both shown by the production
command: sector p.e. (column eff) governs how efficiently work is
converted to units of production, and p.e. (column p.e.) governs how
much product each unit of production yields.
Production is limited by available work, materials and resource
contents. These limits are all rounded down.
Example: if a unit takes 16 work (tech or guns), then 600 work at 100%
sector p.e. can make at most 37 units, rounded down from 600 * 100% /
16 = 37.5. 76 work at 76% sector p.e. can make 3, rounded down from
76 * 76% / 16 = 3.61.
Output is units times p.e. Level output isn't rounded. Item output
is rounded down.
Example: a tech center making 37 units at p.e. 0.6 (edu=20) yields 37
* 0.6 = 22.2 tech (before tech log). 3 units yield 1.8 tech.
Example: a defense plant making 37 units at p.e. 0.6 (tech 35) yields
22 guns (rounded down from 22.2). 3 units yield 1.8g, randomly
rounded.
If item output needs to be adjusted downward (production backlog), the
number of units made is likewise adjusted. It is rounded randomly.
Example: a 100% refinery with 156 work can make 156 units. Its
p.e. at tech 30 is 5.0, so this yields 780p. But if it already has
9500p, it can make only 499 more. That's 99.8 units, rounded randomly
to either 99 or 100.
Materials and money consumed are a multiple of units made. No
rounding there.
Resource depletion depends on units made and is rounded randomly.
Work consumed is units made times work per unit divided by sector
production efficiency. Rounded randomly. Any work left can normally
be used at the next update (it "rolls over").
Example: the tech center making 37 units consumes 37 * 16 / 100% = 592
work, with 8 work left. It also consumes 37d 185o 370l $11100.
Example: the tech center making 3 units consumes 3 * 16 / 76% = 63.2
work, randomly rounded to 63 or 64, with 13 or 12 work left. It also
consumes 3d 15o 30l $900.
Example: the defense plant making 3 units consumes work the same. It
additionally consumes 1o 15l 30h $30 when it makes one gun, and twice
as much when it makes two.
Rounding intermediate values like "units of production" is awkward.
It's better to round only final results. These are item output,
materials consumed, resource depletion and work consumed. Round item
output down, and the rest randomly. Don't round level output (it's a
floating-point value) and money consumed (also floating-point, since
the previous commit).
For item production, this shifts the random variations from number of
products made to materials and work consumed.
Example: the first defense plant again makes 22 guns (now rounded down
from 22.5). The second one now always makes two guns (rounded down
from 3.61 * 0.6 = 2.166) instead of 1.8 randomly rounded.
This is nice, because budget and production can now predict the number
of items made exactly. Before, budget fluctuated randomly just like
the update, and production rounded down.
Note that budget used to be even worse: until commit 6f7c93c
(v4.3.31), we rounded units of production randomly rather than down.
The 100% tech center randomly made 37 or 38 units, which is much more
relevant than random rounding of item output.
Furthermore, work is now fully used both for item and level
production, to the limit permitted by materials and resource contents.
Example: the first tech center now makes 37.5 units, yielding 37.5 *
0.6 = 22.5 tech. It consumes 37.5d 187.5o 375l $11250 and all 600
work (fractions randomly rounded).
Example: the second tech center now makes 3.61 units yielding 1.805
tech, consuming 3.61d 18.05o 36.1l $1083 and all 76 work.
The production command duplicates much of the update's sector
production code, so it needs a matching update. The next commit will
reduce the duplication.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Call callers assign the return value to sp->sct_avail now. Move the
assignment to do_feed() and drop the return value.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
The code to build sectors got quadruplicated in Chainsaw. We've since
fixed numerous inconsistencies, but still have four copies of the
code. Thanks to the recent work on upd_buildeff(), we can now use it
to replace the other three copies. Rename it back to to buildeff()
while there.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
newe() and prod() duplicate parts of the update's do_feed(), except
they round babies down instead of randomly, to get a stable,
conservative forecast. Unlike the update, they assume sufficient
food. Inaccurate for sectors that are going to starve or have
suboptimal population growth. Not documented. Has always been that
way.
Eliminate the undocumented assumption by replacing the duplicate code
by a call of do_feed(). Add a suitable parameter to do_feed() to
preserve the different rounding.
The update test shows the improvement.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Civilians, military and uw work only up to their sector's population
limit. The population limit depends on the sector type's maximum
population, research if RES_POP is enabled, and the sector's
efficiency for big cities.
The population limit may decrease between computation of work in
do_feed() and the end of the update:
* Research declines (only relevant with RES_POP). Work is not
corrected. The declined research will apply at the next update.
Since levels age after production is done, any work corrections
could only affect leftover available work. Wouldn't make sense.
The effect is negligible anyway. Even with an insanely fast decline
of 60% (level_age_rate = 1, etu_per_update = 60), the population
limit decreases by less than 10% in the worst case.
* upd_buildeff() changes sector type and efficiency. Work is
corrected only when this changes the sector type from big city to
not big city.
It isn't corrected on other sector type changes. These can affect
maximum population since the sector type's maximum became
configurable in commit 153527a (v4.2.20). Sane configurations don't
let players redesignate sectors to a type with different maximum
population. The server doesn't enforce this, though.
It isn't corrected when a big city's efficiency decreases, but
sector type change isn't achieved. Harmless, because tearing down a
city takes very little work (25 for 100%), so efficiency decrease
without type change means the work we have must be safely below any
sane population limit's work.
Good enough. However, the code implementing the work correction for
big cities is unclean. Get rid of it by tweaking the rules: a big
city's extra population does not work. City slickers, tsk, tsk, tsk.
At least they still pay their taxes.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
produce() limits production to how many units the workers can produce,
rounding randomly. It charges work for the units actually produced,
discarding fractions.
If you get lucky with the random rounding, you may get a bit of extra
work done for free. Else, you get to keep the unused work, and may
even be undercharged a tiny bit of work. Has always been that way.
The production command assumes the random rounding rounds up if and
only if the probability to do so is at least 50%. Thus, it's
frequently off by one for sectors producing at their worker limit.
The budget command runs the update code, and is therefore also off by
one, only differently.
Rather annoying for tech and research centers, where a single unit
matters. A tech center with full civilian population can produce 37.5
units in 60 etus. Given enough materials, it'll fluctuate between 37
and 38. Production consistently predicts 38, and budget randomly
predicts either 37 or 38. Both are off by one half the time.
Fix this as follows: limit production to the amount the workers can
produce (no rounding). Work becomes a hard limit, not subject to
random fluctuations. Randomly round the work charged for actual
production. On average, this charges exactly the work that's used.
More importantly, production and budget now predict how much gets
produced more accurately. They're still not exact, as the amount of
work available for production remains slightly random.
This also "fixes" the smoke test on a i686 Debian 6 box for me. The
root problem is that floating-point subexpressions may either be
computed in double precision or extended precision. Different
machines (or different compilers, or even different compiler flags)
may use different precision, and get different results.
Example: producing 108 units at one work per unit, sector p.e. 0.4
needs to charge 108 / 0.4 work. Computed in double precision, this
gets rounded to 270.0, then truncated to 270. In 80 bit extended
precision, it gets rounded to 269.999999999, then truncated to 269.
With random rounding instead of truncation, the probability for a
different result is vanishingly small. However, this commit
introduces truncation in another place. It just happens not to mess
up the smoke test there. I doubt this is the last time this kind of
problem upsets the smoke test.
Why upgrade? I'm not a lawyer, but here's my take on the differences
to version 2:
* Software patents: better protection against abuse of patents to
prevent users from exercising the rights under the GPL. I doubt
we'll get hit with a patent suit, but it's a good move just on
general principles.
* License compatibility: compatible with more free licenses, i.e. can
"steal" more free software for use in Empire. I don't expect to steal
much, but it's nice to have the option.
* Definition of "source code": modernization of some details for today's
networked world, to make it easier to distribute the software. Not
really relevant to us now, as we normally distribute full source code.
* Tivoization: this is about putting GPL-licensed software in hardware,
then make the hardware refuse to run modified software. "Neat" trick
to effectively deny its users their rights under the GPL. Abuse was
"pioneered" by TiVo (popular digital video recorders). GPLv3 forbids
it. Unlikely to become a problem for us.
* Internationalization: more careful wording, to harden the license
outside the US. The lawyers tell us it better be done that way.
* License violations: friendlier way to deal with license violations.
This has come out of past experience enforcing the GPL.
* Additional permissions: Probably not relevant to us.
Also include myself in the list of principal authors.
This could make production command mispredict resource-depleting level
production. Stock game is not affected. In fact, such a product
would be highly unusual.
prod() and produce() dereferenced resource uninitialized for products
depleting resource "none" (p_nrdep != 0 && p_nrndx == 0). The latter
even wrote to it.
Depleting "none" makes no sense, and the depletion is now ignored.
Before, it could conceivably crash the server or corrupt the game.
Item production is limited to 999 units, level production is
unlimited.
Commit 0e721173 (v4.2.15) changed prod() from no limit to 999 units,
which fixed it for items, and broke it for levels. Undo the change
for levels.
other. Ensure headers in include/ can be included in any order
(except for econfig-spec.h, which is special). New header types.h to
help avoid inclusion cycles. Sort include directives. Remove some
superflous includes.
(P_LCM, P_HCM, P_TLEV, P_RLEV, P_ELEV, P_HLEV, P_URAN): Use -1 instead
of 0 for `no product', shift down product indexes and update
product.config and sector.config accordingly.
(budg, prod, show_sect_capab, produce, produce_sect): Adapt test for
no product.
(ef_elt_byname): Remove the hack to hide pchr[0].
(prod_eff): Oops on no product.
member p_effic by sctstr member d_peffic. Tables updated.
(show_sect_capab): Adapted.
(prod_eff): Adapted; requires changing first parameter to sector type.
Callers changed.
(P_MDUST): Remove, because pchr[P_MDUST] now identical to
pchr[P_DUST].
(ltend, multifire, quite_bigdef, mine, landmine)
(do_loan, prod, printdiff, sell, sona, stre)
(tend, fire_dchrg, vers, work, ac_planedamage)
(ac_shipflak, ask_off, get_mine_dsupport, att_fight)
(ask_move_in_off, detonate, sd, land_gun)
(land_unitgun, lnd_fort_interdiction, lnd_fortify)
(perform_mission, pln_mine, pln_mobcost)
(retreat_ship1, retreat_land1, shp_sweep)
(shp_fort_interdiction, shp_missle_defense)
(new_work, growfood, upd_land, land_repair)
(get_materials, do_mob_ship, do_mob_land)
(load_it, unload_it, prod_plane, produce)
(guerrilla, upd_buildeff, spread_fallout)
(upd_ship, ship_repair, min, dmin, MIN):
Remove min() and dmin() functions and replace
with a MIN macro in misc.h. Remove local MIN
macros and use the new one in misc.h. This
change removes the need for the special
case for _WIN32.
(fuel, look_ship, multifire, mission, sona)
(plane_sona, ef_open, player_accept, player_main)
(ac_dog, att_get_combat, calc_mobcost)
(ask_move_in_off, intelligence_report)
(build_mission_list_type, perform_mission)
(show_mission, use_supply, dodistribute)
(allocate_memory, max, dmax, MAX):
Remove max() and dmax() functions and replace
with a MAX macro in misc.h. Remove local MAX
macros and use the new one in misc.h. This
change removes the need for the special
case for _WIN32.
