Group retreat still doesn't work, because when boar() passes a sunk
ship to retreat_ship(), its owner has been reset to POGO already.
This makes it impossible to find the group to retreat. Instead, it
attempts to retreat ships that sank in the same sector with group
retreat orders and with the same fleet letter assigned. If any exist,
shp_may_nav() oopses, and prevents actual retreat of these ghosts.
The other retreat conditions don't have this problem, because they
call putship(), which resets the owner, only after retreat_ship().
Making boar() work the same is not practical. Instead, add an owner
parameter to retreat_ship(), and for symmetry also to retreat_land().
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
The root cause is in put_combat(): after it sinks the ship, it calls
att_get_combat(), which treats a combat object with a dead ship as an
error, tells the attacker "not in the same sector!", and "recovers" by
putting the combat object into an error state. Too hard for me to fix
right now, so put in a FIXME comment.
The error state trips up retreat. boar() uses the victim's ship
number in the combat object to find the ship it may have to retreat.
Putting the combat object into an error state sets this number to
zero. If that ship exists, and isn't owned by the attacker, and has
RET_BOARDED set, it retreats. Oops. Broken when Empire 2 factored
out common combat code.
Fix by saving the ship number while it's still valid.
This uncovers the next bug: we now pass a dead ship to retreat_ship().
Oopses since commit f743f37. Its commit message says "Harmless, but
avoid it anyway." Going to revert.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
TREATIES has issues:
* Treaties can cover attack, assault, paradrop, board, lboard, fire,
build (s|p|l|n) and enlist, but not bomb, launch, torpedo and
enlistment centers.
* Usability is very poor. While a treaty is in effect, every player
action that violates a treaty condition triggers a prompt like this:
This action is in contravention of treaty #0 (with Curmudgeon)
Do you wish to go ahead anyway? [yn]
If you decline, the action is not executed. If you accept, it is.
In both cases, your decision is reported in the news.
You cannot get rid of these prompts until the treaty expires.
* Virtually nobody uses them.
* Virtually unused code is buggy code. There is at least one race
condition: multifire() reads the firing sector, ship or land unit
before the treaty prompt, and writes it back after, triggering a
generation oops. Any updates made by other threads while trechk()
waits for input are wiped out, triggering a seqno mismatch oops.
* The treaty prompts could confuse smart clients that aren't prepared
for them. WinACE isn't, but is reported to work anyway at least
common usage. Ron Koenderink (the WinACE maintainer) suspects there
could be a few situations where it will fail.
This feature is not earning its keep. Remove it. Drop command
treaty, consider treaty, offer treaty, xdump treaty, reject treaties.
Output of accept changed, obviously.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
boar() lets a sector board if it has mobility or usable land units.
Embarked land units are not usable. But it tests only "on ship", not
"on land unit". Broken in 4.0.17.
Why upgrade? I'm not a lawyer, but here's my take on the differences
to version 2:
* Software patents: better protection against abuse of patents to
prevent users from exercising the rights under the GPL. I doubt
we'll get hit with a patent suit, but it's a good move just on
general principles.
* License compatibility: compatible with more free licenses, i.e. can
"steal" more free software for use in Empire. I don't expect to steal
much, but it's nice to have the option.
* Definition of "source code": modernization of some details for today's
networked world, to make it easier to distribute the software. Not
really relevant to us now, as we normally distribute full source code.
* Tivoization: this is about putting GPL-licensed software in hardware,
then make the hardware refuse to run modified software. "Neat" trick
to effectively deny its users their rights under the GPL. Abuse was
"pioneered" by TiVo (popular digital video recorders). GPLv3 forbids
it. Unlikely to become a problem for us.
* Internationalization: more careful wording, to harden the license
outside the US. The lawyers tell us it better be done that way.
* License violations: friendlier way to deal with license violations.
This has come out of past experience enforcing the GPL.
* Additional permissions: Probably not relevant to us.
Also include myself in the list of principal authors.
other. Ensure headers in include/ can be included in any order
(except for econfig-spec.h, which is special). New header types.h to
help avoid inclusion cycles. Sort include directives. Remove some
superflous includes.
