Fix the bug demonstrated by the previous commit:
take_casualties_from_lands() limits total casualties to @each. It
should limit each land unit's casualties, and only if !may_kill. This
can lead to fewer casualties than called for; oops in
take_casualties(). Broken in commit 025e9cc25, v4.4.0.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Land units with capability security get a combat bonus regardless of
efficiency. This lets players get the benefits of a security unit at
a discount: just don't build it beyond 10%.
Multiply the combat bonus by eff/100. Together with the previous
commit, this closes bug#64.
Note that the the strength of a security unit's commando raid is
already proportional to its efficiency.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Guerrilla are created loyal to the old owner. When the sector
converts, they switch their allegiance to POGO. This is a bit of a
hack.
When guerrilla win their fight for freedom in an old-owned sector, the
old-owner duly changes to POGO. However, the owner doesn't. Broken
in 4.2.6. The "Sector X,Y has been retaken!" message is still sent to
the "new" sector owner.
Simply restoring the owner change lost back then would restore a bug
that goes back to 2.3.7: takeover() doesn't run when an old-owned
sector is liberated. So fix the bug by making that unconditional.
Land units reported captured are actually destroyed, because POGO
can't own any. Oh well.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
take_casualties() first applies casualties without destroying land
units, and if any remain, applies them by destroying land units. This
is wrong, because the remaining casualties may not suffice to actually
kill. Has been that way since land units were added in Chainsaw 3.
Apply remaining casualties more carefully: destroy land units only
when efficiency falls below 10%.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
A land unit with mil military taking N casualties loses N * 100 / mil
points of efficiency. A 50% inf with 20m dies when it loses more than
8m. With 100m, it dies when it loses more than 40m. A land unit
always dies when it loses all military.
In ordinary ground combat, they lose N * 100 / maxmil points of
efficiency, where maxmil is how many military they could load. This
is less damage when the land unit is under-strength. A 50% inf dies
when it loses more than 40m, regardless of how many it has.
An inefficient land unit with a sufficiently high number of military
can die before its military are all killed. A land unit with a
sufficiently low number of military can survive loss of all its
military. Attacking land units return to their starting position.
Defending land units stay put, and get taken over by a victorious
attacker. Neither was possible before 4.0.0 made land unit military
loadable.
The rules for ordinary ground combat may be debatable, but it's better
to be consistent: change land unit damage in guerrilla combat to match
ordinary combat. This reduces damage to under-strength land units.
If che lose, the sector owner profits from the reduced damage. But if
they win, they may take over land units that got all their military
killed.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Land units without military can't contribute to the fight. They can
still get killed, and whether they are depends on their UID.
take_casualties() kills land units in UID order until the required
number of casualties is reached. Killing a land unit without military
provides none, but take_casualties() doesn't care. The land unit
"dies fighting guerrillas", which makes no sense when it's doesn't
have any military.
If the rebels win, they attempt to capture any surviving land units.
Spies hide or get executed instead. Same as for any other violent
sector takeover.
Normal ground combat ignores land units without military. Do the same
here: ignore them in take_casualties(). This protects spies and other
land units without military from the fighting, but exposes them to
capture.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
To spread C casualties among N land units, take_casualties() applies
floor(C/N)+2 to each. Bonkers. Has been that way since land units
were added in Chainsaw 3.
Limit casualties spread to a land unit to their remaining amount.
Should really spread proportionally to military instead of evenly; add
a TODO comment for that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Since the previous commit fixed the update of mc, mc + taken remain
invariant. Don't bother changing mc, use mc - taken instead.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
take_casualties() applies a number of casualties to sector military
and land units. It is utterly confused about land units.
Consider a land unit with efficiency eff that has mil out of maxmil
military. Issues:
* To apply N casualties without destroying it, take_casualties() tries
to kill N * maxmil / mil military. Makes no sense. It's more than
asked for unless mil equals maxmil. It can even be more than mil.
It reduces efficiency by N * 100 / mil points. Note that ordinary
ground combat reduces by N * 100 / maxmil points. See
lnd_take_casualty().
Example: the update test's inf#25 is 100% efficient and has 20m out
of 100m. take_casualties() tries to apply up to 22 casualties out
of the 60 remaining casualties to apply, but decides to apply only
12 for now, to keep efficiency above to 40%. It reduces efficiency
by 12 * 100 / 20 = 60 to 40%, and tries to kill 12 * 100 / 20 = 60
mil, which kills off the 20 that actually exist. It nevertheless
reduces the number of casualties still to apply only by 12.
Example: the update test's linf#28 is 100% efficient and has 20m out
of 25m. take_casualties() tries to apply up to 8 casualties. It
reduces efficiency by 8 * 100 / 20 = 40 points to 60%, and tries to
kill 8 * 25 / 20 = 10 military.
* When it destroys a land unit, it reduces the number of casualties
still to apply by mil * eff/100.0 instead of mil.
Example: the update test's inf#27 is 10% efficient and has 20m out
of 100m. take_casualties() still has 34 casualties to apply, so it
destroys it, killing all 20m. But it reduces the number of
casualties to apply only by 2.
Broken when 4.0.0 made land unit military loadable. Not sure it fully
worked before that, but it's definitely bonkers since.
Fix it as follows:
* To apply casualties to a land unit without destroying it, limit its
losses to its actual number of military, and so that efficiency
stays above 40%. Then simply kill that number.
* Reduce the number of casualties to apply by the exact number killed.
The update test now kills only 8m in linf#28. Still two more than it
should, but that's separate bug, to be fixed next. The fix has no
visible effect for inf#25, because that one gets destroyed later.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
The body count reflects what take_casualties() should do, not what it
actually does. It can be quite off, as the update test's changed
output shows. Mostly because take_casualties() is utterly confused.
That'll be fixed next.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
When military catch che, their their count isn't updated for their
losses. The count is later used when che consider moving to an
adjacent sector. This could conceivably make them move instead of
stay. Broken when Chainsaw 3 added land units. Fix it.
Note that the sector's military count includes land units, but the
adjacent sectors' doesn't. Should be improved some day; add a TODO
comment.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Both ordinary ground combat and guerrilla combat basically kill
combatants one by one randomly until one side is eliminated. The odds
of each side taking a hit are computed from combat strengths.
Ordinary combat factors bonuses into the odds. It doesn't mess with
the number of men.
Guerrilla combat does the same for the bonus due to relative
happiness. It doesn't for land units with security capability: these
fight as if they had twice as many military. Changes both odds and
number of men. This inflates the body count reported to the sector
owner. Visible in tests/update/journal.log, where rebels kill 110 out
of 70 military. It also complicates take_casualties(). Has been that
way since security land units were added in Chainsaw 3.
To fix the body count and simplify take_casualties(), make capability
security affect only the odds, not the number of men. Without further
adjustments, this would reduce guerrilla losses: fewer men mean fewer
combat rounds mean fewer chances for rebels to die. To compensate,
increase the multiplier from two to four. This should make security
units a bit tougher. Document the bonus in "info Guerrilla".
More body count bugs remain.
Reusing ordinary combat rules and code for guerrilla combat would be
nice, but isn't feasible for me right now.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Several headers define macros that use ef_ptr() without including
"file.h". Fix that. Drop redundant inclusions elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
update.h is a convenience header to include headers commonly needed in
update code. The price for the convenience is superfluous recompiles.
Include necessary headers directly, and drop update.h
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
They didn't since commit 93d033cf, v4.3.26. Drawback: micromanagement
incentive to unload them for the update. Similar incentive has always
existed for military on ships.
Since the previous commit, land units loaded on land units get
unloaded when the carrier dies fighting che. Such land units get
stuck in the sector if the take over, and can be boarded. Doesn't
feel right, and increases the micromanagement incentive. Avoid by
letting them fight.
When che destroy a land unit, any embarked units remain stuck on their
now dead carrier. Closely related to and same impact as the bug fixed
in commit 8ccad0d7. Broken since Chainsaw 3 added land units.
The obvious fix would be to match what normally happens when a carrier
gets destroyed: destroy the cargo. Requires recursion. To keep
things as simple as possible, destroy plane cargo, but unload land
unit cargo. That way, the only cargo of cargo to visit are nukes on
planes.
Unloading the land units creates another problem, which will be
addressed in the next commit.
Why upgrade? I'm not a lawyer, but here's my take on the differences
to version 2:
* Software patents: better protection against abuse of patents to
prevent users from exercising the rights under the GPL. I doubt
we'll get hit with a patent suit, but it's a good move just on
general principles.
* License compatibility: compatible with more free licenses, i.e. can
"steal" more free software for use in Empire. I don't expect to steal
much, but it's nice to have the option.
* Definition of "source code": modernization of some details for today's
networked world, to make it easier to distribute the software. Not
really relevant to us now, as we normally distribute full source code.
* Tivoization: this is about putting GPL-licensed software in hardware,
then make the hardware refuse to run modified software. "Neat" trick
to effectively deny its users their rights under the GPL. Abuse was
"pioneered" by TiVo (popular digital video recorders). GPLv3 forbids
it. Unlikely to become a problem for us.
* Internationalization: more careful wording, to harden the license
outside the US. The lawyers tell us it better be done that way.
* License violations: friendlier way to deal with license violations.
This has come out of past experience enforcing the GPL.
* Additional permissions: Probably not relevant to us.
Also include myself in the list of principal authors.
When take_casualties() kills a land unit, it neglects to take it off
its carrier. This triggers an oops in unit_cargo_init(). Instead of
fixing this, just don't let them fight. They can't defend against
other attacks, either.
guerrilla() lets only the sector owner's land units fight. But
take_casualties() spread the casualties among all land units in the
sector. Thus, defending land units could survive a defeat if foreign
land units were present. The sector takeover then had che capture
them, or their crews blow them up. The foreign land units were
damaged silently.
Losses of sectors, ships, planes, land units and nukes are tracked in
the lost file. To keep it current, makelost() and makenotlost() were
called whenever one of these changed owners. Cumbersome and
error-prone. In fact, the lost file was never perfectly accurate.
Detect the ownership change in the prewrite callback and call
makelost() / makenotlost() from there. Remove lost file updates from
where they're no longer needed: right before a put. takeover() is a
bit more involved: it doesn't put the sectors, but all callers do,
except for guerrilla(). So remove the lost file update from
takeover(), but add it to guerrilla().
This takes care of lost file update for all ownership changes that go
through ef_write(). It can't take care of any missing updates for
changes that don't go through it.
Planes normally sit in their base (sector or carrier), where they can
be spied, damaged, captured, loaded, unloaded, upgraded and so forth.
All this must not be possible while they fly. There are two kinds of
flying planes: satellites in orbit, and planes flying a sortie.
Satellites in orbit have always been marked with flag PLN_LAUNCHED.
Works. What didn't work was tracking planes flying a sortie.
If you look at one sortie in isolation, up to three groups of planes
can be flying at any point of time: the primary group, which carries
out the sortie's mission (bomb, transport, ...), their escorts, and a
group of hostile planes flying interception or air defense.
The old code attempted to track these planes by passing those groups
to the places that need to know whether a plane is flying. This was
complex and incomplete, and broke down completely for the pin-bombing
command.
It was complex, because the plane code needs to keep track of all the
call chains that can lead to a place that needs to know whether a
plane flies, and pass the groups down the call chains. This leads to
a rather ugly passing of plane groups all over the place.
It was incomplete, because it generally failed to pass the escorts.
And the whole scheme broke down for the pin-bombing command. That's
because pin-bombing asks the player for targets while his planes are
loitering above the target sector. This yields the processor and lets
other code run. Which does not get the flying planes passed.
The new code marks planes and SAMs (but not other missiles) flying a
sortie with flag PLN_LAUNCHED (the previous commit laid the groundwork
for that), and does away with passing around groups of flying planes.
This fixes the following bugs:
* Many commands could interact with foreign planes flying for a
pin-bombing command as if they were sitting in their base. This
includes spying, damaging, capturing, loading, or upgrading them,
and even getting intercepted by them. Any changes to those planes
were wiped out when they landed. Abusable.
* The bomb command could bomb its own escorts, directly (pin-bomb
planes) or through collateral damage, strategic sector damage,
collapsing bridges or nuke damage. The damage to the escorts was
wiped out when they landed.
* If you asked for a plane to fly both in the primary group and the
escort group, you got charged fuel for two sorties instead of one.
* pln_put1() and pln_put() now recognize planes that didn't take off,
and refrain from making them land. Intercept (since commit
c64e2149) and air defense can do that. Making them land had no
ill-effects, but it was still wrong.
There's one new problem: if PLN_LAUNCHED doesn't get reset properly,
due to game crash during flight or some other bug, the plane gets
stuck in the air. Catch and fix that on game start in ef_verify().
Mil are not required for building units since 4.0.0. l_mil was still
initialized to l_item[I_MILIT], and used instead of that in a couple
of places. Fix those, and remove the initialization.
