shiprepair() limits the efficiency gain to how much the workers can
build, rounding randomly. It charges work, money and materials for
the efficiency actually gained, rounding work up, money down, and
materials randomly. Same for planerepair() and landrepair(). Has
always been that way.
If you get lucky with the random rounding, you may get a bit of extra
work done for free.
The budget command runs the update code, and can be off by one due to
different random rounding.
Sector production used to have the same issue, only more serious,
because a single unit of tech production matters much more for the
budget than a single point of unit efficiency gain. I fixed it in
commit 6f7c93c, v4.3.31.
Fix it for unit building the same way: limit efficiency gain to the
amount the workers can produce (no rounding). Work becomes a hard
limit, not subject to random fluctuations. Randomly round work and
money charged for actual gain, like we do for materials. On average,
this charges exactly the work and money that's used.
This lets budget predict how much gets built a bit more accurately.
It's still not exact, as the amount of work available for building
remains slightly random, and the build cost is randomly rounded.
The old rounding of work for ships carries the comment "I didn't use
roundavg here, because I want to penalize the player with a large
number of ships." Likewise for planes. Rounding work up rather than
randomly increases the work cost by 0.5 per ship, plane or land unit
on average. I could keep the penalty by adding 0.5 before random
rounding. Not worth it, since the effect is actually pretty trivial.
Let's examine a fairly extreme case: an airfield with 600 available
work repairing a huge number of lightly damaged planes, say f2 with
81% average efficiency. The old code lets the airfield repair roughly
600 / 6.5 = ~92 planes, the new code 600 / 6 = 100.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
If player->simulation, shiprepair(), planerepair(), landrepair() must
use the bp map, and must not change game state.
Copy the sector to a scratch buffer, update it from the bp map, work
on the sector normally, then write back to the bp map. This is
simpler and safer.
Since get_materials() loses its connection to the bp map, move its
declaration out of budg.h.
While there, drop an ancient debugging logerror() from landrepair().
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Stopping a sector disables repairs of own ships completely. Foreign
ships, however, repair just fine, consuming the sector's materials
and, if it's a harbor, its available work.
Disable repair of all ships in stopped sectors. This is consistent
with plane and land unit repair.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Use a single array member instead of multiple scalar members. Only
the array elements that replace scalar members are can be non-zero for
now.
This is a first step to permitting more build materials.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
The work required for build and repairs is traditionally a function of
build materials: 20 + lcm + 2*hcm for ships, planes and land units,
and (lcm + 2*hcm + oil + rad)/5 for nukes. Make it independently
configurable instead, via new ship-chr, plane-chr, land-chr, nuke-chr
selector bwork, backed by new struct mchrstr member m_bwork, struct
plchrstr member pl_bwork, struct lchrstr member l_bwork, struct
nchrstr member n_bwork. Keep the required work exactly the same for
now.
Clients that compute work from materials need to be updated. Easy,
since build work is now exposed in xdump.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
SAIL has issues:
* Sail orders are executed at the update. Crafty players can use them
to get around the update window.
* The route is fixed at command time. You can't let the update find
the best route, like it does for distribution.
* The info pages documenting it amount to almost 100 non-blank lines
formatted. They claim you can follow friendly ships. This is
wrong. They also show incorrect follow syntax. Unlikely to be the
only errors.
* Few players use it. Makes it a nice hidey-hole for bugs. Here are
two nice ones:
- If follow's second argument is negative, the code attempts to
follow an uninitialized ship. Could well be a remote hole.
- If ship #1 follows #2 follows #3 follows #2, the update goes into
an infinite loop.
* It's more than 500 lines of rather crufty code nobody wants to
touch. Thanks to a big effort in Empire 2, it shares some code with
the navigation command. It still duplicates other navigation code.
The sharing complicates fixing the bugs demonstrated by
navi-march-test.
Reviewing, fixing and testing this mess isn't worth the opportunity
cost. Remove it instead. Drop commands follow, mquota, sail and
unsail. Drop ship selectors mquota, path, follow.
struct shpstr shrinks some more, on my system from 160 to 120 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
The autonavigation feature has issues:
* Autonavigation orders are executed at the update. Crafty players
can use them to get around the update window.
* Usability is poor:
- The order command is overly complex, not least because it can do
five different things: clear, suspend, resume, declare route, set
cargo levels.
- Unlike every other command involving movement, order does not let
you specify routes, only destination sectors.
- Setting cargo levels can silently swap start and end point of a
circular route, because "this keeps the load_it() procedure
happy". Maybe it does, but it surely keeps players confused.
- Setting "start" cargo levels actually sets the "end" levels, and
vice versa. Has always been broken that way.
- Predicting what exactly autonavigation will do at the update isn't
easy.
* The info pages documenting it amount to almost 400 non-blank lines
formatted. They claim only merchant ships can be given orders.
This is wrong. Unlikely to be the only error.
* Few players use it, and its workings at the update a fairly opaque.
Makes it a nice hidey-hole for bugs. Here are two:
- Unlike the scuttle command, autonavigation happily scuttles trade
ships while they're on the trading block.
- Unlike the load command, autonavigation can load in friendly and
allied sectors.
* It's more than 700 lines of rather crufty code nobody wants to
touch. Thanks to a big effort in Empire 2, it shares code with the
navigation command. It still duplicates load code. The sharing
complicates fixing the bugs demonstrated by navi-march-test.
Reviewing, fixing and testing this mess isn't worth the opportunity
cost. Remove it instead. Drop commands order, qorder and sorder.
Drop ship selectors xstart, xend, ystart, yend, cargostart, cargoend,
amtstart, amtend, autonav.
xdump ship sheds almost half its columns. struct shpstr shrinks, on
my system from 200 to 160 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Damage due to lack of maintenance is now limited by the unit's minimum
efficiency.
Before, units could die. Unfortunately, the update left any embarked
units on their dead carrier. Should have seen this when I fixed a
related bug in commit c2c0d1ff, v4.3.22. Broken for ships and land
units when Empire 2 added their maintenance cost, and for planes when
commit 2e40a4bb (v4.3.4) replaced nuclear stockpiles by nuke units.
The common root cause of these bugs is the update bypassing pre-write
functions (bug#1010856).
If another unit with the same number got built, it picked up the stuck
cargo, triggering the oops from commit 6fb5caf6, which see.
In "stuck on dead carrier" state, units pretty much behave as if their
carrier was still alive, with additional protection from the fact that
a dead carrier can't be damaged or boarded.
The server detects this state on startup since commit 7da9aab5, and
refuses to start.
Only a deity can take units off a dead carrier.
Why upgrade? I'm not a lawyer, but here's my take on the differences
to version 2:
* Software patents: better protection against abuse of patents to
prevent users from exercising the rights under the GPL. I doubt
we'll get hit with a patent suit, but it's a good move just on
general principles.
* License compatibility: compatible with more free licenses, i.e. can
"steal" more free software for use in Empire. I don't expect to steal
much, but it's nice to have the option.
* Definition of "source code": modernization of some details for today's
networked world, to make it easier to distribute the software. Not
really relevant to us now, as we normally distribute full source code.
* Tivoization: this is about putting GPL-licensed software in hardware,
then make the hardware refuse to run modified software. "Neat" trick
to effectively deny its users their rights under the GPL. Abuse was
"pioneered" by TiVo (popular digital video recorders). GPLv3 forbids
it. Unlikely to become a problem for us.
* Internationalization: more careful wording, to harden the license
outside the US. The lawyers tell us it better be done that way.
* License violations: friendlier way to deal with license violations.
This has come out of past experience enforcing the GPL.
* Additional permissions: Probably not relevant to us.
Also include myself in the list of principal authors.
Replacing getrel(getnatp(US), THEM) by relations_with(US, THEM) makes
a difference only when US equals THEM.
Replace patterns like "us == them || getrel(getnatp(us), them)..." by
"relations_with(us, them)...".
Commit 7da69c92 (v4.3.20) removed use of automatic supply from
prod_ship(). It removed bp_enable_cachepath(), but left behind the
final bp_disable_cachepath(); bp_clear_cachepath(). Clean that up.
Food supply during update adds complexity to the update. How much
good it does to players is highly doubtful; certainly nobody can rely
on it. It isn't covered by the starvation command. Starving ships or
land units can steal enough food from their sector to make it starve,
too. Finally, the supply code is notoriously hard to use correctly.
We don't know of issues with the update's use, but we haven't
convinced ourselves that there aren't any either.
Change snxtitem_all() loops that skip everything but a carrier's cargo
to use snxtitem_cargo() in scra(), scuttle_ship(), scuttle_land(),
takeover_ship(), takeover_land(), trade_desc(), feed_ship().
negative. Some places considered $0 as bankrupt, some didn't. Fix
the ones that did:
(repo_list): report command misreported countries with $0 as broke.
(init_nats): If you had $0, logging out and back in bankrupted you.
(produce_sect, upd_ship): Failed to build sectors and produce stuff
for countries with $0.
type. Make it abstract because that's possible. Change data layout
so that the slots belonging to a sector are together in memory, it's
nicer to the cache.
(bp): The new type. Users changed.
(get_wp): Update accordingly.
(alloc_bp): New.
(update_main, calc_all): Use it. Before, calc_all() allocated 1/7
more than necessary.
(shiprepair, planerepair, landrepair): Use it. Behavioral change:
ship repairs outside harbors and plane repairs by a carrier can use
fewer materials. Before, such repairs consumed each required
commodity as far as available. Now, they consume the same fraction of
the real cost of each commodity, i.e. commodity use is limited by the
most scarce commodity. Neither old nor new behavior make much sense,
but the new code is simpler.
other. Ensure headers in include/ can be included in any order
(except for econfig-spec.h, which is special). New header types.h to
help avoid inclusion cycles. Sort include directives. Remove some
superflous includes.
member p_effic by sctstr member d_peffic. Tables updated.
(show_sect_capab): Adapted.
(prod_eff): Adapted; requires changing first parameter to sector type.
Callers changed.
(P_MDUST): Remove, because pchr[P_MDUST] now identical to
pchr[P_DUST].
(feed_ship, feed_land): Use it.
(do_feed): Use it. Estimate of food needed was one too large for
integer food needs. Used to round fractional food need to nearest
instead of up for supply_commod(), which could cause starvation.
(s_commod, get_minimum): Use it. Estimate of food needed was one too
large for integer food needs. s_commod() used to reserve one more
than get_minimum() would have returned; it's now the same.
(famine_victims): New.
(feed_people): Use it. This rounds victim fractions down instead of
up. It also dosn't flush needs <=1 to zero. Doesn't change
starvation, as do_feed() always produces at least one emergency food.
Does change food consumption.
(starve_some): New.
(feed_people): Use it.
(feed_ship): Use feed_people(). This rounds victim fractions down
instead of up.
(feed_land): Use feed_people(). Rounding of victim fractions
unchanged. Feeds all people not just mil; closes#913997.
(starv_people): New.
(starv_sects, starv_ships, starv_units): Use it. Fixes starve land to
talk about people instead of mil.
(starv_sects): Use famine_victims() rather than feed_people(). Take
emergency food into account, because feed_people() doesn't. Don't aim
for one extra food, for consistency with starv_ships() and
starv_units().
(feed_people): Remove useless parameter. Simplify.
(starv_ships, starv_ships): Use famine_victims() rather than
feed_ship() and feed_land().
(feed_ship, feed_land): Remove useless parameters. Internal linkage.
Simplify.
(feed_land): Call resupply_commod() only if there's a food shortage.
Don't scrounge lnd_ship for food, resupply_commod() already does.
