"diff -q" isn't blessed by POSIX anyway. Neither is -u, but it should
be widely available. -c is blessed, but I find its output hard to
read.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Now covered in tests/bridgefall. Damage perturbed, because deleting
the bridges from the setup makes defend() roll fewer dice.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Sector 0,2 takes a lot of damage. When it gets shot to deity, the
rest of the test can be upset. Avoid by putting more civilians there.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Copying the ship copies the ship to follow. When the source ship
doesn't follow a ship, the target ship is made to follow the source.
Screwed up since Chainsaw added the means to copy a ship. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Copying the sector copies its distribution center. When the source
sector has none, the target sector is made to distribute to the
source. Unexpected. Zap the distribution center then.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Setup uses edit to build units. Stupid idea, because that misses unit
initialization normally done by build, directly or via
unit_wipe_orders(). Use build instead.
Changes test output harmlessly: ship xbuilt, ybuilt go from 0,0 to the
building sector, ship#0's builder goes from 98 to 0, all ships'
cargostart and cargoend go from 0 to -1, jhb range from 0 to 35, and
land unit retreat percentage from 0 to 42.
Setup no longer needs country 98. Drop it.
Setup no longer copies 2,0 to 0,0 messing up its distribution center.
Harmless.
Setup doesn't need POGO's tech level anymore, so don't set it to 400.
Nukes are now built at their required tech level. Also harmless.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
final.xdump changes, because setup no longer copies 3,-1 to 1,-1,
messing up its distribution center. Harmless.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Let deities build in any sector. If the deity's tech level is too
low, use the required tech level instead. Don't require or use
materials, work or money. Bridge spans still require support.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
With EASY_BRIDGES off, bridge spans need to be next to a bridge tower
or a bridge head that is at least 20% efficient to remain standing.
When a bridge tower or head gets damaged below 20%, adjacent spans may
lose support. Bug: they don't fall when they're next to another
bridge head below 20%.
Has always been broken.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
With EASY_BRIDGES on, bridge spans need to be next to land or a bridge
tower to remain standing.
Land can't go away, but a bridge tower can fall. Bridge spans next to
it may lose support then. Bug: they don't fall when they lose support
that way. Fix that.
Broken in commit 40eb78e, v4.3.12.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
bridgefall() wants to do this:
for all possible pairs of directions (i, j)
if i and j cancel out
continue
do stuff
It does it by adding direction offsets to start coordinates, and
comparing the resulting coordinates to the start coordinates. Fine,
except it neglects to normalize the resulting coordinates.
Harmless in practice, because you can get an incorrect result only
when the path goes around the world, which it can do only in a 4x2
world.
Fix it anyway, by testing "directions cancel out" directly.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Stuff sitting on bridges isn't covered, yet. tests/fire has some. To
be moved here eventually.
The test exposes bugs. They're marked "BUG:" in the test input.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
By switching build_nuke() to sector_can_build(), build_charge().
Report missing available work, or else missing materials, or else
missing money, for consistency with the other things you can build.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
By switching build_nuke() to sector_can_build(), build_charge().
Changes reporting of missing stuff to be like for ships, planes and
land units:
* Report missing available work, or else missing materials, or else
missing money instead of materials, or else money, or else work.
* Report what materials are missing instead of how much materials have
to be there.
* Clean up stray ';' in reporting of missing work.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
scrap has always returned the scrapped planes' full crew, regardless
of efficiency. build, however, charged only 10%. If you built ten
planes with one crew each, you used up one military. Or none, if you
abused random rounding. If you scrapped them again, you got ten back.
Pretty pricey way to manufacture military, but wrong all the same.
4.2.3 plugged this hole by making build never round military to zero.
Ugly special case, and not documented. Also doesn't prevent abuse of
random rounding for planes requiring more than 10 crew, but such
planes don't exist in the stock game.
Redo this fix:
1. Make scrap return crew proportional to efficiency, randomly
rounded. Note that scrap returns only two thirds of the other
materials, rounded down. Recycling materials isn't perfect, but
recycling aircrew is.
2. Drop the special case from build: treat military just like other
materials.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
If both materials and avail are missing, report missing avail instead
of materials, to avoid tempting the player to move in materials only
to discover avail is lacking, too.
Report what materials are missing instead of just "Not enough
materials". Does not yet include military for planes, but that's
next.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Construction materials required for building a ship, plane or land
unit are rounded randomly. Crafty players exploit this to save
materials: they put just enough materials there so that build succeeds
when it rounds down. Then they simply keep trying until it succeeds.
Planes and land units are built at 10%, so rounding happens when
materials for 100% aren't multiples of ten. If they're below ten, you
can even build without materials. In the stock game, this is the case
for linf, and many plane types.
Ships are built at 20%, so multiples of five aren't rounded. Ship
building never rounds in the stock game.
Prevent the abuse of random rounding by requiring the required
fractional amount rounded up to be present. Don't change the actual
charging of materials; that's still randomly rounded.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
drnuke_const is not covered, yet.
Random rounding causes some complications: sometimes build succeeds
without materials. Troublesome spots are clearly marked in the test
input.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Moving the telegram files away isn't enough, we also have to reset
nat_tgms. actofgod/setup-POGO does it already, but fire/setup-POGO
doesn't. Do it in begin_test instead, right where the telegram files
are moved away.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
TREATIES has issues:
* Treaties can cover attack, assault, paradrop, board, lboard, fire,
build (s|p|l|n) and enlist, but not bomb, launch, torpedo and
enlistment centers.
* Usability is very poor. While a treaty is in effect, every player
action that violates a treaty condition triggers a prompt like this:
This action is in contravention of treaty #0 (with Curmudgeon)
Do you wish to go ahead anyway? [yn]
If you decline, the action is not executed. If you accept, it is.
In both cases, your decision is reported in the news.
You cannot get rid of these prompts until the treaty expires.
* Virtually nobody uses them.
* Virtually unused code is buggy code. There is at least one race
condition: multifire() reads the firing sector, ship or land unit
before the treaty prompt, and writes it back after, triggering a
generation oops. Any updates made by other threads while trechk()
waits for input are wiped out, triggering a seqno mismatch oops.
* The treaty prompts could confuse smart clients that aren't prepared
for them. WinACE isn't, but is reported to work anyway at least
common usage. Ron Koenderink (the WinACE maintainer) suspects there
could be a few situations where it will fail.
This feature is not earning its keep. Remove it. Drop command
treaty, consider treaty, offer treaty, xdump treaty, reject treaties.
Output of accept changed, obviously.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Two bugs. First, multifire() checks the condition only for surface
ships, not for submarines. Second, multifire() neglects to write back
the ship after retreating it. The player is told the ship retreats,
but it actually stays where it is.
Broken since retreat was added in Chainsaw. Previous fixes (commit
8065fe8, v4.3.1 and commit de2651e, v4.3.19) "fixed" only the
bulletin.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
It's not firing, yet.
While there, trim an unwanted blank line before reporting the first
sector ready.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Can't actually happen with the current damage formulas. If it could,
then the special treatment would be inconsistent with sectors and land
units.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
We check all necessary conditions for being able to fire before
prompting for a target. Except for land unit guns. Clean that up.
fort_fire(), shp_fire() or lnd_fire() fail only when the fort, ship or
land unit can't fire. If that happens, our checking is incomplete.
Oops then.
We recheck some of the necessary conditions after getting the target.
However, because the command fails when the firing sector, ship or
land unit has changed since the first check, these rechecks can't
fail. Drop them.
Note that the rechecks were just as useless before commit 66165f3
fixed fire to fail on change, because they rechecked the unchanged
cached copy instead of the possibly changed original.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
This was a lame attempt at limiting the ripple effect of adding /
removing commands. Better means are now available, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Changed xdump output is too painful to review. final.xdump should
still catch changes that are visible only in xdump.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
