In the old times, power didn't consider tech at all. Chainsaw's
option NEWPOWER (mandatory since v4.2.14, on by default before)
changed this dramatically: the power factor gets multiplied by
max(1, tech) / 500.
In the early game, small absolute tech differences yield large power
factor differences. For instance, if country A has tech level 10, and
B has 5, then A gets a factor two boost.
As the game progresses, tech differences between viable countries tend
to grow, but only slowly. The influence on power diminishes. For
instance, if C has tech level 270 and D has 240 (quite a respectable
tech lead), then C gets a modest 1.125x boost over D.
Change the factor to (20 + tech) / 500. Now A's advantage is only
1.2, and C's is 1.115.
You might think that's rather low. However, tech is not power unless
you project it, and then it manifests itself as sectors, population
and other stuff power counts.
The same tech term occurs in plane power, except with just tech
instead of max(1, tech) . Change it there as well, for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Use a single array member instead of multiple scalar members. Only
the array elements that replace scalar members are can be non-zero for
now.
This is a first step to permitting more build materials.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
The work required for build and repairs is traditionally a function of
build materials: 20 + lcm + 2*hcm for ships, planes and land units,
and (lcm + 2*hcm + oil + rad)/5 for nukes. Make it independently
configurable instead, via new ship-chr, plane-chr, land-chr, nuke-chr
selector bwork, backed by new struct mchrstr member m_bwork, struct
plchrstr member pl_bwork, struct lchrstr member l_bwork, struct
nchrstr member n_bwork. Keep the required work exactly the same for
now.
Clients that compute work from materials need to be updated. Easy,
since build work is now exposed in xdump.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Notable gaps in its coverage are fallout, most of guerrilla, delivery,
distribution, ALL_BLEED and LOSE_CONTACT.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Exercise version, show and xdump, except for xdump of game state.
The xdump part is mostly factored out of tests/smoke.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
When the player aborts the command at the movement prompt, we write
back stale ships or land units, triggering a generation oops. Any
updates made by other threads meanwhile are wiped out, triggering a
seqno mismatch oops.
Broken in commit 24000b4, v4.3.33. Fix by restoring the lost
shp_nav_stay_behind() and lnd_mar_stay_behind() calls.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
When the player declines to abandon a sector, we write back stale land
units, triggering a generation oops. Any updates made by other
threads meanwhile are wiped out, triggering a seqno mismatch oops.
The culprit is lnd_abandon_askyn(): when the player declines, it
returns without calling check_sect_ok(), check_land_ok(). Broken in
commit 7c1b166, v4.3.33. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
recvclient() calls ef_make_stale() only when it does actual I/O, via
io_output() and io_input(). Missed in commit 2fa5f652, v4.3.24. Call
it directly when it doesn't do actual I/O.
This makes navi-march-test expose a bug in march: when the player
declines to abandon a sector, we write back stale land units,
triggering a generation oops.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
MALLOC_CHECK_=3 makes glibc check for memory allocation programming
errors. It's the factory default, but set it anyway just in case
someone disabled it for speed.
Non-zero MALLOC_PERTURB_ makes glibc wipe memory value on allocation
and deallocation. The actual value determines the bit pattern. Set
it to the value of environment variable EMPIRE_CHECK_MALLOC_PERTURB or
else a pseudo-random number, and record it in sandbox/malloc-perturb.
See mallopt(3) for more information.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
When the player aborts the command at the movement prompt, or declines
to abandon a sector, unit_move() returns without freeing the list.
Found with valgrind. Broken in commit 24000b4 and commit 7c1b166,
both v4.3.33.
Free the list on these returns, too.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Telling the player his torpedo "slams into land" can give a clue on
the direction to the target. No good when the target is out of range,
because we shouldn't tell the player more than that then.
Screwed up in 4.2.2. Fix by checking range before line of sight.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
This partly reverts a change made in Empire 2.3 to tell a submarine's
opponent only that he's dealing with a "sub" instead of the
submarine's UID and type. Hiding submarines is done by prsub().
Uses:
* Command torpedo: defender depth charges or torpedoes an attacking
submarine
If you can attack a submarine reactively, you should be able to
attack it actively, too. But that requires its UID. Reveal it
again, but keep the type hidden.
* Command fire: defender fires back at a submarine using its deck gun
Submarines need to surface to fire deck guns, so they shouldn't be
treated any different than surface ships. Revert Empire 2.3's
change entirely there, i.e. defender learns type as well as UID.
* Command torpedo: attacking submarine hits its target
Keep the submarine hidden.
* Commands torpedo and fire: attacking ship hits a submarine
The attacker passed the UID as command argument, so it doesn't
matter whether we print it or not. Printing it is simpler to code,
so do that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Mission is cleared only when firing at a target that is out of range.
Screwed up when missions were added in Chainsaw. Always clear it when
firing. Matches torpedo.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
The cost is meant to be proportional to efficiency / 100, but the code
truncates the fraction to zero. Broken in Empire 2.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Group retreat still doesn't work, because when boar() passes a sunk
ship to retreat_ship(), its owner has been reset to POGO already.
This makes it impossible to find the group to retreat. Instead, it
attempts to retreat ships that sank in the same sector with group
retreat orders and with the same fleet letter assigned. If any exist,
shp_may_nav() oopses, and prevents actual retreat of these ghosts.
The other retreat conditions don't have this problem, because they
call putship(), which resets the owner, only after retreat_ship().
Making boar() work the same is not practical. Instead, add an owner
parameter to retreat_ship(), and for symmetry also to retreat_land().
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
This reverts commit c3a839934f.
The commit message's claim that the code never actually retreats
ghosts is wrong: boar() does.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Conflicts:
src/lib/subs/retreat.c
The root cause is in put_combat(): after it sinks the ship, it calls
att_get_combat(), which treats a combat object with a dead ship as an
error, tells the attacker "not in the same sector!", and "recovers" by
putting the combat object into an error state. Too hard for me to fix
right now, so put in a FIXME comment.
The error state trips up retreat. boar() uses the victim's ship
number in the combat object to find the ship it may have to retreat.
Putting the combat object into an error state sets this number to
zero. If that ship exists, and isn't owned by the attacker, and has
RET_BOARDED set, it retreats. Oops. Broken when Empire 2 factored
out common combat code.
Fix by saving the ship number while it's still valid.
This uncovers the next bug: we now pass a dead ship to retreat_ship().
Oopses since commit f743f37. Its commit message says "Harmless, but
avoid it anyway." Going to revert.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
It's only printed for ships. Looks misplaced when it's followed by
"sunk" or other damage reports.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
With offensive support but no defensive support, there's no empty line
separating the support table from the text that follows. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Instead of listing all the ships or land units ordered, just print how
many got ordered, and describe the order, like this:
[0:640] Command : retr 2/3 bg itb
2 ships ordered to retreat along path bg when injured, torpedoed, bombed
[0:640] Command : retr 2 h
1 ship ordered not to retreat
fleetadd doesn't list the ships it reassigns, either. On the other
hand, stop lists the sectors it stops. Perhaps it should be gagged,
too.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
It's redundant; retreat path 'h' cancels orders just fine. Document
that instead. 'c' still works, and I don't plan to break it as long
as it doesn't get in the way, which seems unlikely.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Optional arguments can save typing. Mandatory arguments are more
easily discoverable: just run the command and answer its prompts.
Empire traditionally uses optional arguments only for expert features.
Consider mission:
[0:640] Command : mission
Ship, plane or land unit (p,sh,la)? s
ship(s)? 0
Mission (int, sup, osup, dsup, esc, res, air, query, clear)? int
operations point? .
frg frigate Early Bird(#0) on an interdiction mission, centered on 21,-3, radius 0
1 ship
Compare retreat:
[0:638] Command : retreat
ship(s)? 0
shp# ship type x,y fl path as flt? flags
0 frg frigate 21,-3
1 ship
Arguments are not discoverable this way.
Change retreat to work like mission: make the second argument
mandatory, and if it's 'q', show retreat orders, else treat it as path
and ask for conditions:
[0:637] Command : retreat
ship(s)? 0
Retreat path, or q to query? jj
Retreat conditions ('?' to list available ones)? i
shp# ship type x,y fl path as flt? flags
0 frg frigate 21,-3 jj i
1 ship
To reduce smart client and script breakage, keep retreat with one
argument working as before, but print a deprecation warning.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Has no effect now. Before the recent rewrite of automatic retreat, it
could be used to trigger group retreat while staying put.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
"torped" comes from symbol table retreat_flags. Visible in output of
edit, retreat, lretreat and xdump. Tolerable in edit, but player
commands like retreat should really use proper words.
Fixing it in retreat_flags changes xdump output, thus risks breaking
clients. Do it anyway, since no known client recognizes this
particular symbol value.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
Much of the retreat code duplicates navigate and march code. Worse,
retreat's version is full of bugs:
* Land units can sometimes retreat when they couldn't march: while on
the trading block (forbidden with march since 4.0.9), crewless
(likewise since 4.0.0), kidnapped in a foreign sector (inconsistent
since land units were added in Chainsaw 3), loaded on a ship
(likewise) or a land unit (inconsistent since trains were added in
4.0.0).
* Ships can retreat while on the trading block (forbidden with
navigate since 4.0.9)
* Land units can't retreat into foreign sectors even though they could
march there, namely when sector is allied or the land unit is a spy.
They can march there since 4.0.0.
* Land units keep their fortification on retreat. Has been that way
since retreat was added in Chainsaw.
Then there's group retreat. It's basically crazy:
* It triggers retreat for everyone in the same fleet or army, one
after the other, regardless of retreat path, conditions (including
group retreat), or even location. The latter is quite abusable
since retreats aren't interdicted. Has been that way since retreat
was added in Chainsaw.
* Group retreat fails to trigger when the originally retreating ship
or land unit has no retreat path left when it's done. Broken in
commit b860123.
Finally, the reporting to the owner is sub-par:
* When a retreat is cut short by insufficient mobility or
obstructions, its end sector isn't reported, leaving the player
guessing.
* Non-retreats can be confusingly reported as retreat to the same
sector. Can happen when the retreat path starts with 'h' (obscure
feature to suppress a single retreat), or when a group retreat
includes a ship or land unit without retreat orders.
* Interaction with mines during retreat is reported before the retreat
itself, which can be quite confusing.
* Sweeping landmines isn't reported at all.
* Much code and much bulletin text is dedicated to reporting what
caused the retreat, even though it should be perfectly obvious.
Rewrite this on top of common navigate and march code. Reuse of
common code fixes the "can retreat when it couldn't navigate/march"
and the "can't retreat into sectors it could navigate or march into"
bugs, and improves the reporting.
One special case isn't a bug fix but a rule change: mountains. The
old code forbids that explicitly, and it's clearly intentional, if
undocumented. The new code allows it by not doing anything special.
Turn group retreat into an actual group retreat: everyone in the same
fleet and sector with the the same retreat path and group retreat
condition joins the group. The group retreats together, just like in
navigate and march.
Take care to always report the end sector. When retreat is
impossible, report "can't retreat". When retreat is partial, report
"and stays in X,Y". When it's complete, report "stopped at X,Y".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>
